Construction Schedule Delays – 2015 Edition

2015 (816 pages)

by W. Stephen Dale and Robert M. D’Onofrio

A comprehensive treatise on schedule delay analysis, this book references over 500 legal cases on topics that include CPM scheduling, concurrent delay, and constructive acceleration. Presented through a collection of 130 cases using varied schedule delay methods, this invaluable guide offers expert advice, analysis, and insights for any lawyer, contractor, engineer or other professional who deals with construction schedule delays. The book is available in print and electronically on Westlaw.


Visit Thomson Reuters Legal Solutions

Briefing Papers: Legal Issues in Construction Schedule Delay Analysis

July 2014

by W. Stephen Dale and Robert M. D’Onofrio

Published by Thomson Reuters, this article provides a comprehensive overview of the key legal issues presented in the application of schedule delay analysis when allocating responsibility for delays on construction projects. These issues include the burden of proof; the distinction between delays and suspensions of work under federal contracts; the contractor’s right to early completion; acceleration; concurrency; and waiver of completion.


Read PDF 

Construction Subcontracting: A Comprehensive Practical and Legal Guide

2014 (628 pages)

Published by the ABA, this book brings together a team of experienced attorneys and industry experts to examine the multifaceted subject of construction subcontracting. CPMI President Mike D’Onofrio, P.E., co-authored chapter 3, “Scheduling, Delays and Coordination,” with Editor Joseph C. Kovars, Esq. The chapter considers the contract provisions often used in subcontract agreements that address scheduling, coordination, and delays. It also examines the types of project delays that may occur, the methods used to measure delay, and the damages usually associated with delays.


Purchase Book

What Is a Schedule Good for? A Study of Issues Posed by Schedules on Complex Projects

Winter 2013

by Robert M. D’Onofrio and Anthony L. Meagher

Construction lawyers and scheduling consultants have long grappled with the various methods of analyzing schedule delays. Recently, efforts have been made to establish common nomenclature and consensus regarding preferred methods. This article, published by the American Bar Association, Construction Lawyer, explores those efforts, offers suggestions as to the application of preferred methods, and discusses related considerations in drafting contract schedule provisions.


Read PDF

Scheduling (Programme) Analysis: Hired Gun Advocacy or Effectively Meeting a Burden of Proof?

October 2012

by Donald G. Gavin and Robert M. D’Onofrio

There is an undeniable need for logical, factually supportable and credible evidence to assist in calculating delay, time extensions, concurrency, and compensability, as well as liquidated damages and actual damages. Yet the differing methods of scheduling (programme) analysis can lead to distrust and rejection of some or all resulting evidence. This feature article in Construction Law International suggests a series of best practices to improve the reliability of such evidence and to increase its acceptability.


Read PDF

From Cars to Crews: The Evolution of Construction Scheduling

Fall 2012

by the Team at CPMI

Over the years, numerous construction tools and scheduling methods have emerged as a means to solve construction challenges. Location-based scheduling (LBS) is one of the latest methods that promise to increase efficiency. It is causing many to take a closer look at how projects and work move through time.


Read More

Can a Contractor Have a Critical Path Delay When the General Contractor Does Not?

December 2011

by Christopher W. Carson, PSP; Mark Boe, P.E., PSP; and Shannon L. Campbell, PSP

CPMI’s Mark Boe teamed up with co-authors to provide a discussion and analysis on this interesting question. Following its presentation at the AACE International 2011 Annual Meeting, the technical article was selected and published in the December 2011 issue of Cost Engineering.


Read PDF

Reconciling Concurrency in Schedule Delay and Constructive Acceleration

Winter 2010

by W. Stephen Dale, Esq., and Robert M. D’Onofrio

Published by the Public Contract Law Journal, this article discusses damage recovery by contractors in cases where construction projects are delayed. It focuses on acceleration cost due to delay for which both owner and contractor are held responsible.


Read PDF

AACE Recommended Practice for Forensic Schedule Analysis

April 2010

by Michael F. D’Onofrio, P.E., and Kenji P. Hoshino, PSP, CFCC

Presented at the American Bar Association Forum on the Construction Industry 2010 Annual Meeting, this article by CPMI President Mike D’Onofrio and Kenji Hoshino of Project Controls and Forensics, LLC, provides an interesting perspective on the AACE RP from a variety of viewpoints.


Read PDF

The ABCs of DRBs: What They Are and How Well They Work

Spring 2006

by the Team at CPMI

For a host of reasons, disputes have become increasingly prevalent in the construction industry. When they affect deadlines, productivity, and costs, they must be dealt with promptly to keep the project on schedule and the budget on target. One approach to resolution, which has been evolving since its inception almost 30 years ago, is the use of a Dispute Review Board (DRB).


Read More

Identifying Concurrent Delay

Winter 2004

by the Team at CPMI

Properly assessing concurrent delay can be one of the most difficult challenges encountered in resolving delay claims. First, of course, it’s essential to understand how concurrent delay is defined.


Read More

Techniques and Methods for Assessing Delays

Spring 2002

by the Team at CPMI

Time is important to everyone, especially to those in the construction industry. Every construction contract stipulates either a time of performance or a specific project completion date. Yet, with so much attention to time, construction projects are frequently subject to delays. Sorting out the issues and determining which party is responsible often proves difficult and time-consuming. Though many techniques are available for determining schedule impacts, not all produce valid results.


Read More